Almost without exception, everyone that I know from the Paleo community loathes GMO food. The story goes something like this. Small farmers produce the organic heirloom stuff we buy at the farmers markets. We dive into nutrition and then read Omnivores Dilemma and watch Food Inc. We learn than organic farming is good and GMO farming is evil.
What if we were wrong about GMO food? What is the purpose of GMO? It is to get higher crop yields per acre using less chemical pesticides. If they didn’t do that, they never would have been adopted.
But what about the nutritional quality? My response is who cares? The crops that are most being genetically modified are foods on the no-no list. According to article The Most Common GMO Foods by Jill Corleone, the 3 most common GMO foods are:
- Canola Oil
What do I care if canola oil is GMO?
Paleo people are told to avoid grains, legumes and industrial seed oil. The fact soy, corn and canola oil are GMO shouldn’t affect us. We don’t eat them. It isn’t our battle. I read one statistic that said without GMO, conventional farmers would need an additional 9% more land to farm to get the same yield.
Where are they going to get that 9% from? Other farm land where GMO is currently not being used? Is it possible that a campaign that successfully demonizes GMO foods actually results in the expansion of industrial farming?
In the absence of GMO, I just don’t see conventional farmers embracing the Joel Salatin organic farming model. I think they will acquire more acreage, deforest and use chemicals. And the land they deforest might be land currently being used by one of the cool small organic farmers we chat with every week at our local Farmers Market. Conventional farmers have deeper pockets.
Maybe I am dead wrong on this. I’m throwing up this idea for others to bat around. What if GMO got even better and were able to use even less acreage to grow foods we already are avoiding? Might that be a win? Although we don’t consume those GMO crops, we do share the same water table and I’d prefer it had less chemical pesticide run off.
I didn’t want to get into the ethics of patenting seeds and the litigious nature of the companies that do. I think that is a separate topic.
Love to hear your thoughts.