In a recent podcast, paleo proponent Robb Wolf rattled off a list of books he recommended. This was mentioned.
Lights Out: Sleep, Sugar, and Survival by T. S. Wiley is an amazing book right up until the end. Readers of this site already know that I am convinced of the evolutionary fitness and nutrition argument. Although my science background is limited (self taught), it makes sense to me. Lights Out makes a compelling case for extending the body of evolutionary health to sleep.
For much of evolution, we did not have night time light. This meant man slept more and moved less in the winter months. Food sources were more scare in winter and strongly favored protein and fat. During the summer, days were longer and carbohydrate sources were more plentiful. Man would eat carb sources in the summer, which would spike insulin that promotes fat gain. That fat would be utilized for fuel during the winter. This is the basic concept of Summer vs Winter Mode, which NephroPal wrote about last year.
Lights Out is mostly about the evolutionary and hormonal aspects to light and sleep. Longer days (more light) tell the body via hormones that it is summer and that means “eat sugar now before winter comes“. Shorter days (less light) tell the body to sleep more and eat less. The problem is we are not only in constant Summer Mode from endless supplies of carbohydrates, we are in constant Summer Mode from excessive lighting and shortened winter sleep cycles. Winter Mode is for repair. When that repair doesn’t happen (no Winter Mode), it can result in obesity, cancer and mental illness.
Even though it goes deep into hormonal science, I found the writing style extremely clear. Some of the reviewers on Amazon did not like the confident, know-it-all tone of the author. I loved it. I felt Lights Out did a brilliant job of digging deep into the science and then stepping back to draw focus on important points.
Before I got to the last 30 pages, I was ready to call this the book of the year. It was that excellent. Then it went down a path of mixing history of the low-fat movement with government conspiracy theories. Unlike the rest of the book, this section seemed garbled and out of place. I lost some confidence in the author. It was enough of a red flag for me to go online and do more research on the author. The results were not favorable – although I could not find anyone that had issues with the first 170 pages of Lights Out. Regardless, I am sitting here having read an amazing book where I don’t know if I can trust the source. My gut says what I learned is accurate, but I think I need to do a lot of follow up research. The good news is winter is still months away, so I have plenty of time to discover if the Lights Out thesis has merit.